<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Accounting Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3405</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>full text</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>full text</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>0</FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17009</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>full text</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">full text</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">full text</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://far.ui.ac.ir/article_17009_8d7b0d9e9b446e834117be59a3c40645.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Accounting Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3405</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Survey of Relationship between Corporate Governance and Innate and Discretionary Accruals Quality of Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Survey of Relationship between Corporate Governance and Innate and Discretionary Accruals Quality of Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>14</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17003</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Y</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hassas Yeganeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Accounting, Allameh Tabatabaiy, University of Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H</FirstName>
					<LastName>Didar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Accounting, University of urmia, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A</FirstName>
					<LastName>Eskandari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This paper studies the relationship between some corporate governance mechanisms and discretionary and nondiscretionary accrual items’ quality of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange during the period of 1382 to 1388. Sample of this study consists of 120 companies. To measure the quality of accruals, Francis Model (2005) is been used. Ownership structure, board of director’s combination, audit size and the existence of internal auditing have been considered as corporate governance mechanisms. The relation of ownership structure and board of director’s combination with accruals quality are investigated by Multiple Regression Model and T-test is used for audit size and the existence of internal auditing. Results indicate that there is a significant and direct relation between ownership structure and board of director’s combination with nondiscretionary accruals quality but this relation with discretionary accruals quality is significant and reverse. On the other hand, there is no significant relation between audit size and internal auditing variables with accruals quality.
 

 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This paper studies the relationship between some corporate governance mechanisms and discretionary and nondiscretionary accrual items’ quality of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange during the period of 1382 to 1388. Sample of this study consists of 120 companies. To measure the quality of accruals, Francis Model (2005) is been used. Ownership structure, board of director’s combination, audit size and the existence of internal auditing have been considered as corporate governance mechanisms. The relation of ownership structure and board of director’s combination with accruals quality are investigated by Multiple Regression Model and T-test is used for audit size and the existence of internal auditing. Results indicate that there is a significant and direct relation between ownership structure and board of director’s combination with nondiscretionary accruals quality but this relation with discretionary accruals quality is significant and reverse. On the other hand, there is no significant relation between audit size and internal auditing variables with accruals quality.
 

 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Corporate governance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">innate accruals quality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">discretionary accruals quality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ownership structure</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">board of director’s combination</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">audit size</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://far.ui.ac.ir/article_17003_0841385c4c972903fee3f9d905d0c986.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Accounting Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3405</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>An Investigation of the Determinants of Working Capital Management in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>An Investigation of the Determinants of Working Capital Management in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>15</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>26</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17004</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A. A</FirstName>
					<LastName>Anvari Rostami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor of Accounting, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>R</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadjadpour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Lecturer of Accounting,Lorestan University, Khormabad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Yaballuei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student in Accounting Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The aim of this paper is to investigate the Determinants of Working Capital Management (WCM) in Tehran Stock Exchange. In this research, to measure WCM, as the dependent variable, we use Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) and Independent variables of research are Debt ratio, ROA, Investment in fixed assets and Cash Flow. For this purpose 600 firms are considered as sample of research and using Multivariate regression model and panel data method have been tested. The result shows that there is a significant negative relationship between WCM and Debt ratio, ROA, Investment in fixed assets and there is a significant positive relationship between WCM and Cash Flow.
 
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The aim of this paper is to investigate the Determinants of Working Capital Management (WCM) in Tehran Stock Exchange. In this research, to measure WCM, as the dependent variable, we use Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) and Independent variables of research are Debt ratio, ROA, Investment in fixed assets and Cash Flow. For this purpose 600 firms are considered as sample of research and using Multivariate regression model and panel data method have been tested. The result shows that there is a significant negative relationship between WCM and Debt ratio, ROA, Investment in fixed assets and there is a significant positive relationship between WCM and Cash Flow.
 
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Working capital management</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cash Conversion Cycle</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ROA</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Debt Ratio</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Investment in fixed assets</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cash flow</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://far.ui.ac.ir/article_17004_741f2ce02f74e97c3a605dbb0cc79c8b.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Accounting Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3405</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Effect of Managerial Overconfidence on Conditional and Unconditional Conservatism</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Effect of Managerial Overconfidence on Conditional and Unconditional Conservatism</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>27</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>44</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17008</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>D</FirstName>
					<LastName>Foroghi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Accounting, University of Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-7164-6728</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Z</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nokhbeh Fallah</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Accounting, University of Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The purpose of this study is investigating the effect of managerial overconfidence on conditional and unconditional conservatism. To attain the mentioned purpose, two hypotheses were developed and a sample of 77 firms was selected by systematic elimination method from the companies listed in Tehran stock exchange during the years of 2002 to 2011. In order to measure conditional conservatism, khan and Watts (2009) model and to measure unconditional conservatism, measure of Givoly and Hayn (2000) and to measure managerial overconfidence, two measures of research of Ahmed and Duellman (2013) were used. Also, to estimate research hypotheses, weighted least squares and panel methods were used. Results of estimating research models indicated that the effects of managerial overconfidence on conditional and unconditional conservatism are negative and significant. In other words, existence of overconfidence in top managers results in decreasing of financial reporting conservatism.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;

 
 
 
 
 
 
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The purpose of this study is investigating the effect of managerial overconfidence on conditional and unconditional conservatism. To attain the mentioned purpose, two hypotheses were developed and a sample of 77 firms was selected by systematic elimination method from the companies listed in Tehran stock exchange during the years of 2002 to 2011. In order to measure conditional conservatism, khan and Watts (2009) model and to measure unconditional conservatism, measure of Givoly and Hayn (2000) and to measure managerial overconfidence, two measures of research of Ahmed and Duellman (2013) were used. Also, to estimate research hypotheses, weighted least squares and panel methods were used. Results of estimating research models indicated that the effects of managerial overconfidence on conditional and unconditional conservatism are negative and significant. In other words, existence of overconfidence in top managers results in decreasing of financial reporting conservatism.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;

 
 
 
 
 
 
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Conditional Conservatism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Unconditional Conservatism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Managerial Overconfidence</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://far.ui.ac.ir/article_17008_18afd6d0e822c1a08a89de210f04b980.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Accounting Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3405</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Relationship between Earning Growth and Stock Returns by Using Residual Income in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Relationship between Earning Growth and Stock Returns by Using Residual Income in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>45</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>56</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17005</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>B</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shamszadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Accounting Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadeghifar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Statistics, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>B</FirstName>
					<LastName>Almasi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Accounting, Hamadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The main objective of this study is to explore the relationship between earnings growth and stock returns using the residual income (RI) model in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. We use residual income (RI) for decomposing earnings growth into growth in RI and growth in invested capital in order to explain its relationship with current and future stock returns. Data were collected for the period 2004 to 2011 from TSE. We use Pearson correlation coefficient to test our hypotheses. The results show, significant positive relationship between growth in RI and current stock returns and significant negative relationship between growth in invested capital and current stock returns. Also, there is a significant positive relationship between growth in RI and future stock returns, and there is no relationship between growth in invested capital and future returns.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;

 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The main objective of this study is to explore the relationship between earnings growth and stock returns using the residual income (RI) model in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. We use residual income (RI) for decomposing earnings growth into growth in RI and growth in invested capital in order to explain its relationship with current and future stock returns. Data were collected for the period 2004 to 2011 from TSE. We use Pearson correlation coefficient to test our hypotheses. The results show, significant positive relationship between growth in RI and current stock returns and significant negative relationship between growth in invested capital and current stock returns. Also, there is a significant positive relationship between growth in RI and future stock returns, and there is no relationship between growth in invested capital and future returns.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;

 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Earnings growth</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Residual income</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Stock Returns</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://far.ui.ac.ir/article_17005_41d57b7af75418f758751c73287b99dd.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Accounting Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3405</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Effect of Personal Incentives Managers on Costs Asymmetric in Tehran Stock Exchange</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Effect of Personal Incentives Managers on Costs Asymmetric in Tehran Stock Exchange</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>57</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>74</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17006</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A</FirstName>
					<LastName>Khani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Accounting, University of Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H</FirstName>
					<LastName>Amiri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Economy, University of Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M. A</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shamohammadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Accounting, University of Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The fundamental assumption in cost accounting is that expense changes in relation with increase and decrease in level of activity is symmetrical. But recent research shows asymmetric behavior of the costs when demand fluctuations. In this study, costs stickiness by taking consideration traditional factors, namely economic factors affecting sticky costs, personal motives of managers in the effective agency factors of the costs asymmetry, are test. A sample of 100 companies was selected having features proposed in this survey during from 1379 to 1389. The results suggest a significant impact of agency variables on asymmetry of selling, general and administrative (SG&amp;A) costs. Hence the asymmetry of Costs due to the agency problem is positively related with personal motivations and empire building of managers.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The fundamental assumption in cost accounting is that expense changes in relation with increase and decrease in level of activity is symmetrical. But recent research shows asymmetric behavior of the costs when demand fluctuations. In this study, costs stickiness by taking consideration traditional factors, namely economic factors affecting sticky costs, personal motives of managers in the effective agency factors of the costs asymmetry, are test. A sample of 100 companies was selected having features proposed in this survey during from 1379 to 1389. The results suggest a significant impact of agency variables on asymmetry of selling, general and administrative (SG&amp;A) costs. Hence the asymmetry of Costs due to the agency problem is positively related with personal motivations and empire building of managers.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cost behavior</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cost stickiness</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cost asymmetry</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">agency problem</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">empire building</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://far.ui.ac.ir/article_17006_6f66a7ee758b810c5584cb6d95061d64.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Accounting Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3405</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Relationships between Firm Specific Factors and Management’s Preferences for an Earnings Threshold</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Relationships between Firm Specific Factors and Management’s Preferences for an Earnings Threshold</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>75</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>88</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17002</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Moradzadehfard</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor in Accounting, Azad University, karaj, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ebrahimy Meymand</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student in Accounting, University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Moradi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Accounting, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Earning management and reaching the earnings threshold have long been in the center of different interested parties’ attention. Previous research has provided mixed evidence on the relative importance of three earnings thresholds which managers seek to achieve. These thresholds include avoiding losses, avoiding earnings declines and avoiding negative earnings surprises. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether firm specific factors influence management’s preferences for an earnings threshold. For this purpose three Logit models are estimated to determine the relationships between firm-characteristics and management’s perceptions of the relative importance of each threshold. Data from a sample of 104 affiliated firms in Tehran Stock Exchange with from year1385 to 1389 -520 firm-year observations- have been analyzed. The results show that firm specific factors influence management’s preferences toward a specific earnings threshold. Large firms are more prone to avoid losses; firms with high growth prospects are more prone to avoid earnings declines and firms with high turnover are more concerned with avoiding negative earnings surprises and earnings declines.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;

 
 
 
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Earning management and reaching the earnings threshold have long been in the center of different interested parties’ attention. Previous research has provided mixed evidence on the relative importance of three earnings thresholds which managers seek to achieve. These thresholds include avoiding losses, avoiding earnings declines and avoiding negative earnings surprises. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether firm specific factors influence management’s preferences for an earnings threshold. For this purpose three Logit models are estimated to determine the relationships between firm-characteristics and management’s perceptions of the relative importance of each threshold. Data from a sample of 104 affiliated firms in Tehran Stock Exchange with from year1385 to 1389 -520 firm-year observations- have been analyzed. The results show that firm specific factors influence management’s preferences toward a specific earnings threshold. Large firms are more prone to avoid losses; firms with high growth prospects are more prone to avoid earnings declines and firms with high turnover are more concerned with avoiding negative earnings surprises and earnings declines.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;

 
 
 
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Earnings Threshold</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Earning Management</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Management Earnings Forecasts</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://far.ui.ac.ir/article_17002_0886aab420b408a967b2b7e4a5eef1e6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Accounting Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3405</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Impact of Financial Constraints and Agency Costs of Investment Efficiency</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Impact of Financial Constraints and Agency Costs of Investment Efficiency</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>89</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>106</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17007</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>R</FirstName>
					<LastName>Baradaran Hassanzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Y</FirstName>
					<LastName>Badavar Nahandi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>L</FirstName>
					<LastName>Negahban</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University of Tabriz, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>his study will discuss the impacts of financial constraints and agency costs on the investment efficiency regarding limited resources and growing importance of investment efficiency. In order to achieve this goal, two hypotheses have been formulated and logistic regression has been used to test hypotheses. Meanwhile in this study regression (ols) has been used to measure investment efficiency and agency costs. This research has been done in 95 listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange based on data contained in financial reports between 2001 – 2012. In this study, financial constraints has been measured using two models of Kaplan and White and wu. Results showed that financial constraints using White and Wu model does not have any effect on investment efficiency but, financial constraints using Kaplan has significant and positive effect on the investment efficiency. Agency costs have significant and negative effect on investment efficiency.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">his study will discuss the impacts of financial constraints and agency costs on the investment efficiency regarding limited resources and growing importance of investment efficiency. In order to achieve this goal, two hypotheses have been formulated and logistic regression has been used to test hypotheses. Meanwhile in this study regression (ols) has been used to measure investment efficiency and agency costs. This research has been done in 95 listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange based on data contained in financial reports between 2001 – 2012. In this study, financial constraints has been measured using two models of Kaplan and White and wu. Results showed that financial constraints using White and Wu model does not have any effect on investment efficiency but, financial constraints using Kaplan has significant and positive effect on the investment efficiency. Agency costs have significant and negative effect on investment efficiency.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Investment Efficiency</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">financial constraints</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Agency Costs</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://far.ui.ac.ir/article_17007_7cccd2f85cb38b56684264d1707b8582.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
